JBG's decision generated a sigh of relief among panicked County officials yesterday. So moribund is MoCo's private sector economy, that attraction of new corporations has given way to a desperate effort to retain the few flagship firms the County has now. So, much like Marriott moving down Old Georgetown Road in a few years, JBG's move is essentially reshuffling the deck chairs on the Titanic; Montgomery County hasn't attracted a major corporate headquarters to relocate here in two decades and counting.
The new JBG SMITH HQ will add 55 new jobs over its existing workforce. But the need to fill such an impressive building in such a prime spot again painfully disproved the MoCo political cartel's claim that corporations demand Metro access over highway and airport access, and walkable retail and restaurants in a mixed-use environment over suburban office parks.
4747 will be on top of not one, but two, Metro stations - the Red Line and future Purple Line. It will be surrounded by the successful and highly popular mixed-use retail, restaurants and housing of the Bethesda Row and Lot 31 developments. It will even have the trendy Dean & DeLuca attached to the building, in an already-built retail structure adjacent to the tower site.
Yet, much like 4500 East-West Highway, the building had no takers to be the anchor office tenant. If you had bought the arguments of Planning Board Chair Casey "What ex parte rules?" Anderson, et al that the new urbanist environment was the key to attracting business...your mind must be officially blown by this turn of events. No, Virginia, mixed-use is not the sole answer to MoCo's economic woes.
JBG is taking a hit to the pocketbook long-term to stay here in Montgomery County, a sacrifice County officials should thank them for profusely (did you know, for example, that electricity is 44% more costly in Maryland than in Virginia for businesses?). JBG is also commendably endorsing the urban, walkable environment it espouses itself with this move.
But County officials shouldn't dwell on their dodging of this latest bullet. They need to act, so that we can finally grow our economy, instead of sticking fingers into all the leaking holes that are increasing by the day. That includes reducing the County's massive taxes and exploding debt, building a new Potomac River crossing to Dulles International Airport, and completing our master plan highway system.
Rendering courtesy The JBG Companies
So you scream "plagiarism" when Betty Beat publishes their story about Anthropologie 56 minutes later than Biz Journals, but you give yourself an entire day to report on JBG's move?
ReplyDelete5:25: We all got the same JBG press release at the same time, old sport. Not a scoop.
ReplyDeleteSo when someone else gets the press release or email you still scream plagiarism.
DeleteWhat defines a scoop? Just curious, not saying your are wrong, I guess I just don't understand.
ReplyDeleteLOFL.
ReplyDeleteThey are adding jobs in a new trophy office building but this is still a LOSS in basement dwelling Robert Dyer's eyes.
This thread has already become a journalism school master class.
ReplyDeleteDyer educating his eager & naive students about press releases.
"Old sport" again.
ReplyDeleteDyer is The Great Gasbag.
Remember when Dyer scooped Tastee Diner? Poppy remembers...
ReplyDeleteSo Friendship Heights loses both JBG and Anthropologie to Bethesda Row in just one day, not long after losing Williams-Sonoma to Bethesda Row and the shops that used to be in The Collection, to CityCenter in the District.
ReplyDeleteSeems like Friendship Heights is the one that is "moribund".
Read his comments here on plagarism when something was posted 45 minutes after him from an email.
ReplyDeletehttps://robertdyer.blogspot.com/2017/07/grapeseed-to-close-in-bethesda.html?m=1#comment-form
I doubt anyone is getting a local Edward R Murrow award for posting chain store press releases real fast. Let's get some perspective.
ReplyDeleteIn Dyer We Trust.
Remember that "World's Oldest Man" themed article that Dyer posted on the demolition a few weeks ago?
ReplyDelete"4747 will be on top of not one, but two, Metro stations - the Red Line and future Purple Line".
ReplyDeleteThe future Purple Line station is not a "Metro station", and 4747 will be on top of neither.
Looks like our "lifelong Bethesda resident" doesn't know this area as well as he claims to.
6:26: The tracks of the Purple Line will come out of the tunnel behind this building and the small retail building next to it. There will also be the new south entrance to the Red Line at Wisconsin and Elm. The planned Carr Properties staircase behind 4747 and 7200 Wisconsin will be a pedestrian cut-through to that Red Line station entrance. Wake up!
ReplyDelete5:59: The old JBG offices will become vacant space when they move. That building is also within Montgomery County. So we just moved the deck chairs on the Titanic again, old sport.
ReplyDelete"The new JBG SMITH HQ will add 55 new jobs over its existing workforce."
ReplyDeletePlus 138 jobs from out of state, thanks to the Vornado merger. It's a total of over 400 jobs - a far bigger deal than Virginia getting those Volkswagen admin jobs you've been citing for a decade. Plus VA spent over $6M to lure those jobs; it's almost as if MoCo realizes it's far cheaper to invest in smaller companies and have them organically grow within the county. Who would have thunk.
You failed to mention a critical element of the story. JBG, headquartered in Friendship Heights, and Vornado/Smith, local headquarter in NoVA, merged and had to make a decision as to where the new consolidated office would be. The decision was Bethesda and the Vornado employees will be relocating to MoCo. This is much more than a reshuffling of chairs this is MoCo beating out NoVa and taking a significant office tenant from a competing market.
ReplyDelete7:03: Yeah, it's far cheaper, but all the big corporations go to Virginia. Pretty dumb.
ReplyDelete7:09: Wrong. We already had JBG SMITH. They're just moving up the street to Bethesda. Vornado was not going to stay in another location after a merger. This is how bad it is now, where MoCo officials have to do an end zone celebration just because an employer we already have doesn't leave! Sad!
ReplyDelete"Vornado was not going to stay in another location after a merger. This is how bad it is now..."
ReplyDeleteLol, what a babbling fool you are, Dyer.
7:23: Perfectly clear English. It only sounds like babbling to you, with your IQ being equal to your belt size.
ReplyDeleteWhere are the cries of plagarism when it's the other way an Dyer posts last?
ReplyDelete"panicked County officials"
ReplyDelete"moribund is MoCo's private sector economy"
"painfully disproved the MoCo political cartel's claim that corporations demand Metro access over highway"
So many blatant falsehoods in this story, but I'll just respond to these.
JBG moving to Virginia was extremely unlikely given their history here, and the fact that most of the region's developers (especially REITs) are headquartered in Maryland.
If you followed regional business happenings, you would see that Montgomery County's economy is very far from "moribund." There is absolutely no hard evidence available to support such a ludicrous claim. I will agree that the county office market is very weak, but that is the case region-wide, and mostly due to Obama's initiative to reduce the footprint of the federal government.
The last quote makes absolutely no sense, since you are reporting on an instance where "the corporation" chose Metro (and Purple Line) access over highway access, just like Marriott did. You should visit some of the office parks along I-270 and I-95 in MD or I-66 and Route 28 in Virginia to see how empty they are and the huge concessions being offered to fill them. Downtown Bethesda actually has one of the region's lowest vacancy rates.
7:33: Montgomery County is indeed moribund - we were the only jurisdiction in the region to experience a net LOSS in jobs; all others
Delete7:33: Montgomery County is indeed moribund - we were the only jurisdiction in the region to experience a net LOSS in jobs since 2000; all others gained. According to the Maryland Association of Retailers, we've lost over 2000 retail jobs since 2000. No major corporation has moved its headquarters here in two decades. Moribund!
DeleteDyer, please quit cursing the darkness of Moribund MoCo, and light a candle and move to the Elysian Fields of NoVa.
ReplyDeleteMoCo had JBG not JBG Smith. Stop creating an alternate reality. There are 138 jobs moving from NoVa to Bethesda.
ReplyDeleteAnd Bethesda is getting Marriott plus Starwood, not just Marriott alone.
ReplyDeleteDyer @ 7:55 AM - There you go again - confusing one sector with the entire local economy. Retail is shrinking everywhere as surplus brick-and-mortar stores, defunct department stores and moribund malls close thanks to Amazon.
ReplyDeleteP.S.: Your Captcha really sucks.
Dyer, your article implies that JBG sought other tenants, but failed to find any, before deciding to move in themselves. Do you have any proof of this?
ReplyDeleteRobert thinks Bethesda should be like Tysons. No thanks. Tysons stinks and it has zero charm or sophistication. If you love it, go there. Please move to Virginia and leave MD alone. No one likes you in Maryland.
ReplyDelete8:28am Bethesda is great, but could be even greater.
DeleteStanding still isn't a winning strategy.
As for Tysons, they're just getting started.
For the record I'm 7:33 am
ReplyDelete"Montgomery County is indeed moribund - we were the only jurisdiction in the region to experience a net LOSS in jobs since 2000; all others gained. According to the Maryland Association of Retailers, we've lost over 2000 retail jobs since 2000. No major corporation has moved its headquarters here in two decades. Moribund!"
There's no point in arguing with you, since you clearly no very little about what you are talking about. I hope you don't say things like this out loud in public.
I suggest taking a college level business or economics class, and heading over to the BLS website for relevant and real statistics. Cheers
It is quite clear that you are talking out of your ass and have zero concept of how a profitable real estate company works. Regarding the current space that JBG will be vacating, that location in Friendship Heights is a top tier location, which will attract many new tenants either looking to expand or move into that area. As of right now, Microsoft and 4 Seasons (?) along with many medical, non profits and small law firms call that area home. It is also 1/2 block from the Metro Station. Their current headquarters building is in need of major updating. I am sure they are smart enough to figure out, that they will be making more money by moving to their new building,and renovating their existing building, who will be paying higher rents, than what their current building is now charging.
ReplyDeleteDyer you should start paying attention and notes on that mag you think is failing they keep getting better and you keep getting more strange with this government cartel talk
ReplyDeleteFWIW, it is typical for developers to lease space in their projects during lease-up. The only thing different about this situation is that the developer's space is being expanded due to its merger.
ReplyDeleteMoCo lost 2000 retail jobs in 17 years. Meanwhile department stores have laid of 100,000 people nationwide in the last 9 months.
ReplyDeleteThe fact that the county has lost so few retail jobs since the year 2000 is a testament to the county's strength.
This is the third time I've posted this statistic, because the author keeps deleting the comment. Why is the author so afraid of factual statements?
The counties that experienced growth in retail jobs - e.g., Culpeper County, Virginia - are exurbs with new stores being built in greenfield development.
ReplyDelete7:43: You are trying to compare national numbers, which in addition are weighted by big box stores of which there are few in MoCo, to the lost jobs in Montgomery County. There is no good way to spin the loss of over 2000 retail jobs. No testament to strength.
ReplyDelete7:48: No, we lost jobs, we didn't just stay stagnant while others grew. And the numbers showing we had a net loss, while everyone else (from big Fairfax to growing Culpeper) had a net gain in jobs, are for all employment sectors, not just retail.
3:24: Is that why the DC Council is proposing legislation to crack down on Pay-to-Play? Are they "strange" too, or just smart like me in pointing out corruption?
ReplyDelete9:50: In fact, I know so much about the moribund MoCo economy that even Hans Riemer's old chief of staff agrees with me.
ReplyDelete8:05: Wrong. We had a net loss in ALL TOTAL jobs, not just in retail.
ReplyDeleteDyer @ 8:17 - What was the number of total jobs lost? You only gave a number for the retail sector.
ReplyDeleteDyer @ 8:15 PM - I don't think he would like you putting words in his mouth.
Dyer @ 8:13 PM - Non sequitur.
Dyer @ 8:10 PM - Montgomery County residents shop at Amazon, not WalMart.
5:11: WTF? Both the numbers, and Hans Riemer's chief of staff endorsing my position on the moribund economy, are in this old article I wrote:
ReplyDeletehttp://robertdyer.blogspot.com/2016/06/growing-consensus-on-montgomery-countys.html
We've been over this 1000 times, Saul Alinsky.
"If every letter must receive a response, send 30000 letters." - Saul Alinsky
I guess you've never sat outside the Walmart in Germantown to see the sea of humanity going in and out of that store. Amazon is only a percentage of what people buy.
http://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdmanual/01glance/economy/html/unemployrates.html
ReplyDeleteJust gonna throw this out there, unemployment rates have dropped in MoCo.
A. Han's Riemer chief of staff could be just as clueless. I mean is an administrative bureaucrat, supposed to be some authority of on the economy?
ReplyDeleteB. I'm pretty sure he would not appreciate you misquoting him on here, which you probably are.
6:44: I linked to HIS OWN WORDS, old sport!
ReplyDelete5:49: Saul Alinsky, I've been telling you for 5 years now, unemployment rate has NOTHING to do with economic development or job creation WITHIN OUR JURISDICTION. It only tells you that people are employed in jobs located in NoVa or DC, because we aren't creating those jobs here.
Why does the author of this blog continually delete comments asking him to provide citations for his data? (In this case, that Montgomery County employment has fallen while the rate in neighboring jurisdictions have improved.)
ReplyDelete8:41: I gave you the URL that has the numbers you're asking for in a previous comment.
ReplyDeleteYour URL is not evidence...do you even read what you write then argue sometimes? I read your source and it shows MoCo private sector, so this does not include NIH or any other non private company. Also, the growth does not taken into account the housing crisis of 2008. Jobs are almost back at its peak 2001 level in 2017.
ReplyDeleteHere is Robert's source since he can't just directly link it and forces readers to go through multiple other sites to get to his data.
Source
If you read the article, NoVa is struggling as well and this is a common theme that people would rather walk, bike and metro to work than drive in the area. People just don't work in these massive office parks as much.
10:25: No, that's not my source for the jobs data - you linked to an article about office parks.
ReplyDeleteYes, we are talking about private sector jobs - those are the ones that have to be created, and can't just be moved here by a Democratic administration to help other Democrats.
My data accounts for the housing crisis, because we had a net loss of jobs while everyone around us had job growth over that same period - we all went through the recession together.
Jobs are not at peak level, because we not only didn't create as many jobs, we didn't create ANY - we had a NET LOSS of jobs. Any that were created were simply canceled out by the job losses.
Google and Apple are among the most powerful companies in the world, and are located in suburban office parks.
Did you read your sources source? The seventhstate's article links to that washington post article in regards to jobs.
ReplyDelete10:58: It's one source, but it wouldn't tell people the important job loss numbers that prove Montgomery County's private sector economy is moribund.
ReplyDeleteOr the fact that it has grown since the housing crisis of 2008?
ReplyDeleteSo, ONE source that wouldn't prove your analysis.
ReplyDeleteSo you got nothing.
A big gasbag.
"I linked to HIS OWN WORDS, old sport!"
ReplyDeleteI don't ever remember Jay Gatsby yelling at his blog readers. In fact, I don't even remember him even raising his voice.
1:42: That's because you obviously never read "The Great Gatsby." No surprise you've ended up where you are today, an unkempt, free dingy apartment/stipend-grubbing stooge for the MoCo political cartel.
ReplyDelete11:15: That was YOUR source, not mine, and it didn't have the statistics that I gave you the URL for, which prove my analysis, you ignoramus.
Dyer @ 8:38 PM - So what is your source for your claim that MoCo has lost jobs outside of the nationally-moribund retail sector?
ReplyDeleteThe author of this blog states: "Montgomery County is indeed moribund - we were the only jurisdiction in the region to experience a net LOSS in jobs since 2000"
ReplyDeleteThis statement is objectively false. Per the Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics, between the years 2000 and 2016 Montgomery County added 16,628 jobs.
Here is the source for this data.
Here is a table comparing Montgomery County's total employment with Fairfax County, the most populous county in Virginia.
5:55: Not sure what point you're trying to make. Fairfax has blown away Montgomery County year after year in job creation. No contest. If you're trying to claim we created more jobs than Fairfax, that is a flat out lie. We had a net loss in jobs since 2000, which doesn't mean a few jobs weren't created here and there, but that the number of jobs we lost more than canceled out those paltry gains - hence, we ended up with a net LOSS since 2000.
ReplyDelete9:36: Are you trying to look stupid? For the third time, I gave you the link to the past article, which linked to Adam Pagnucco's report on the Seventh State that totally backs up what I've been saying all along. Net loss. Net loss. Net loss.
"We had a net loss in jobs since 2000"
ReplyDeleteFALSE! The number of jobs has increased since 2000. Somehow that equates to a "net loss"??? (Hint: "Increase" is the opposite of "loss.")
6:42: Did you drop out of school in 3rd grade? You're doing a Saul Alinsky on steroids. It doesn't matter that a paltry number new jobs were created, it's the total number you have left when you also subtract the jobs that were lost. As the stats I linked to clearly show, the end result was a net LOSS in jobs since 2000.
ReplyDelete"If every letter must receive a reply, send 30,000 letters." - Saul Alinsky
"As the stats I linked to clearly show, the end result was a net LOSS in jobs since 2000"
ReplyDeleteThe stats you link to are out of date. They compare 2001 (not 2000 as you keep repeating) to 2014. The data linked to at 5:55 looks at the same data source (BLS) through 2016. Let's compare, shall we?
Private Sector Jobs in Montgomery County (in thousands):
2000: 369,545
2001: 370,125
2014: 366,240
2016: 373,985
The number of private-sector jobs in Montgomery County today is greater than the number of jobs in 2000 or 2001. Period. End of story. Or, as the author of this blog might say: BABA BOOEY!
7:02: You're moving the year, so if I move the year too, I can just as easily say we've had a net loss in jobs "over the last decade." The number of private sector jobs in Montgomery County today is less than the number of jobs in 2005 or 2008. Period. End of story. BABA BOOEY!
ReplyDelete"If I cherry-pick data, it will tell whatever story I want it to tell!" -- R. Dyer, 7/16/17, 7:12 AM Pacific / 10:12 AM Eastern
ReplyDelete7:41: You just cherry-picked, which allowed me to cherry pick, as well. End result, we have a net LOSS in jobs under either formula.
ReplyDelete7:41 is not cherry-picking, they are merely looking at CURRENT statistics rather than arbitrarily deciding statistics from 2014 are somehow more relevant.
ReplyDeleteThe author of this blog would have his readers believe there are fewer jobs in Montgomery County today than there were in the year 2000. It's a lie.
7:55: Those were the numbers at the time of my report. Now, we have new information from 2016 that shows Montgomery County has suffered a net LOSS in jobs over the last decade.
DeleteBy either calculation, you and the MoCo cartel lose - next loss by 2014 numbers, and net loss over the last decade using 2016 data.
I love it! Moribund Montgomery County!
"Those were the numbers at the time of my report."
ReplyDeleteBut they were not the numbers when you made the statements in this very comment thread that MoCo has suffered a net loss of jobs since 2000. That is incorrect. You were wrong. It's okay! Everyone makes mistakes from time to time. Just be gracious about it and move on.
1:03: Let me talk...really...slowly, so you can understand: There were no 2016 statistics when I and Adam Pagnucco posted our respective reports.
ReplyDeleteBoth of our articles showed, correctly, that based on numbers available through 2014, Montgomery County suffered a net loss in jobs since 2000.
If you want to now, today, bring in the new statistics from 2016, you lose the argument again, because MoCo also has a net loss of jobs over the last 10 years, as well.
You've lost the argument. It's okay! Just be gracious about it and move on. Baba Booey.
Let me talk...really...slowly. so you can understand: In this very comment thread you made the claim that the county has lost jobs since 2000. That claim is false.
ReplyDeletePeriod.
You did not offer the caveat that you were referring to old data. That omission leads to the implication that you're talking about the present. Again: Your claims are false.
And why do we have a 13 year comparison (2001-2014) and then a 10-year comparison ("the last decade")? That's the very definition of "arbitrary." You do realize the last decade brought us the most severe recession in generations, don't you? It would be much more relevant to look at how we're faring post-recession -- and in that case the county has added over 11,000 jobs!!! THANK YOU MOCO CARTEL!! BABA BOOEY, INDEED!
8:08: Due to your extreme density, or devotion to the teachings of Saul Alinsky, you just keep repeating yourself. I can't present it in a simpler form for an IQ lower than belt size. The old articles were written when 2014 was the latest available, and were correct based on that data.
ReplyDeleteNow, with the 2016 data available, we find that Montgomery County has suffered a net LOSS of jobs over the last decade.
You do realize that all the large and small jurisdictions around us had a net gain (except Prince George's), while MoCo had a net loss.
The cartel's record of failure is clear. Baba Booey!