Montgomery County Planning Board commissioner James Hedrick will remain a member of the body, after his February appointment was unanimously "reaffirmed" by the County Council yesterday. County Executive Marc Elrich had vetoed Hedrick's appointment last Friday, leaving the Rockville resident's fate in limbo for several days, as supporters and detractors resumed their debate over his candidacy over the weekend. Hedrick had received eight votes from the eleven-member Council on February 28 to secure his appointment, and needed nine yesterday to survive Elrich's veto.
Hedrick found nine, and then some, when every councilmember supported his appointment at yesterday's Council session. Some councilmembers who showed unusual spine in opposing Council President Evan Glass's behind-the-scenes maneuvering when the new Council first convened last December found their knees buckling on Tuesday. A tweet prior to the meeting inadvertently revealed that the Council had already reached a decison to unanimously support Hedrick, an agreement that was come to off-the-record, out of public view. Some of the same councilmembers who took Glass to task for making decisions off-line in December about committee assignments went along with his ex parte process this time.
It's likely the Council circled the wagons in this case because Glass could have sold the Hedrick Holdouts the argument that this was a vote on principle, of the power and will of the Council versus the executive. Does this mean the more independent minds on the Council will now support the Glass agenda for the rest of his term as president? No, as the competing bills on rent stabilization clearly show.
Is the Hedrick appointment reason for opponents of Thrive 2050 and its threat to end single-family-home zoning to get their blood pressure up? No. As I noted Saturday, Hedrick's support of Thrive and upzoning are hardly unique on the new Planning Board. The Council will not appoint anyone who opposes Thrive. Hedrick's votes will likely be indistinguishable from any other commissioner this Council would have appointed in his place.
If anything, Hedrick's appointment may improve the quality of the Board's work. Even if you disagree with the plans and policies he might vote to approve, his experience as chair of Rockville Housing Enterprises gives him an expertise on some of the technical and practical issues of multifamily housing that has been lacking in some of the commissioners in recent years. Board observers won't soon forget the many classic "amateur hour" moments from the Casey Anderson era, such as commissioners determining the maximum height for a parcel in the Westbard sector by looking at a distorted Google Street View image during a meeting.
One thing is for certain: the Hedrick controversy aside, the developer campaign contributors to the County Council are over-the-moon about the Planning Board situation as a whole. By all rights, the many scandals that ended with the forced resignation of the entire Board last year should have triggered comprehensive investigations by the local media, the Council, the Maryland Attorney General, and the FBI - starting with Farm Road and ending with Liquorgate. Some people might have even been looking at time behind bars in federal prison. Few could have imagined that the Council would be able to not only entirely sidestep investigations, but also seize the unprecedented power to appoint an entirely new Board and Chair all at once.
We can wonder why the media and those other levels of law enforcement agreed to look the other way, much as they did during the 2018 County government $6 million embezzlement scandal. But we can truly know why the Council found the chutzpah to sweep the Anderson-era scandals under the filthy Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission rug.
Once again, it goes back to one of the most pivotal moments in Montgomery County political history: the victory of the County political cartel over the Columbia Country Club in the Purple Line struggle. The elected officials dared to grab the third rail (pun intended), and when the next election came around, they realized that they weren't electrocuted - they were reelected! Turns out, especially when you have the local media in your back pocket, the third rail is a brass ring. If we can beat the Columbia Country Club, they concluded, we can beat anybody.
Energized to try their luck, the 2014-2018 Council approved a massive property tax hike, and the Westbard sector plan. They even aggressively defended the cover-up around, and ongoing desecration of, the Moses African Cemetery in Bethesda. While they ended up getting term limits, albeit with extremely-generous 12-year terms, when the actual elections came around in 2018...the voters - whose posteriors were still smarting from a tax and Westbard spanking they had just received two years prior - voted for the same or similar candidates who had delivered the beatdown to them.
The Council couldn't believe its good fortune. Realizing it now enjoyed serious Trump-shooting-somebody-on-Fifth-Avenue immunity, it could now go for broke. "Smart growth" around transit stations and the 2014 pledge that "we just want the shopping centers, we won't touch the neighborhoods" suddenly gave way to developer fever dreams like Thrive 2050. Serious players like Kenwood and the Citizens Coordinating Committee on Friendship Heights who had to be bargained with in the past could now be ignored, resulting in decisions like the Little Falls Parkway road diet scandal, and the Westbard-area road closure fiasco.
Of course, the Anderson-era Planning Board was the harbinger of this iron-fist, winner-take-all era we've now entered. Gone are the days when well-argued testimony from a resident could lead a commissioner like Francoise Carrier, Amy Presley or Norman Dreyfuss to change their mind on an issue. When you come to a Planning Board session in recent years, you know how the vote is going to go, with extremely rare exceptions. Your only role as a resident or civic association officer is to at least get the opposing view on the record for posterity.
One can hope independent minds will somehow emerge on the new Planning Board. But the Council demonstrated such closed minds in its interview process, that it's hard to believe this new Board won't redefine the term "lockstep" with frequent unanimous votes.
Consider that among the applicants for the interim board was former Rockville Mayor Larry Giammo. By every measure, Giammo was - if anything - overqualified to serve as a Planning Board commissioner. As mayor, Giammo successfully delivered the $400 million revitalization of Rockville Town Center. He also had served as a commissioner on the Rockville Planning Commission prior to that. And after leaving office, he has been a leading voice for the interests of City residents on growth, development and school overcrowding issues. In short, someone familiar with the nuts-and-bolts of development and its impact on public facilities and infrastructure, but with a record of representing the best interests of the community. That is the essence of what you would want in a Planning Board commissioner, right?
The Council didn't even include Giammo on its finalist interview list.
That tells you everything you need to know about the credibility of the County Council in this process.
Giammo is also a straight, white, male so already three strikes against him.
ReplyDeleteThis is nauseating and altogether unsurprising. Perhaps I am alone in my view that what makes the area so special and desirable is the --ever more difficult to see for the unchecked construction boom-- beauty: canopies of mature trees, grass-filled yards, flowering shrubs, all that. If we sit idly and allow the community to be bulldozed and paved over, what makes us any more desirable than Logan Circle or Ballston? We moved her because it *wasn't* high-density housing. I realize the builders and their servile minions of the County Council could not possibly care less the fate of residents who have paid the stunning real estate prices to live here, but don't we, the residents, care about what is at stake? Why are there not street-filling protests throughout the county to protest the wholesale corruption of the Council, to demand Thrive be abolished? Our communities are not company towns with our dwellings leased to us by the Council. Why is there not greater fury at our houses, homes, neighborhoods, communities being threatened thus? The builders and Council treat us like a pet, owned and abused and tortured by a spoiled, sociopathic child.
ReplyDeleteSpot-on. As a 61 year old legacy resident born and raised right here in Brown, I'm baffled by the apathy 24/7/365
DeleteIn my experience most development approvals come after extensive meeting between the developer and the planning department. This is where most of the issues of acceptable height, density, setbacks and many other zoning code compliance issues are worked out. Most developers and their architects largely comply with zoning regulations, with only a few exceptions that require interpretation by the design advisory committee and eventually the planning board. In most cases, once a project gets to the board, it has been well sorted for compliance.
ReplyDeleteSince the MoCo Planning Board includes approvals for a population of over 1.1 million, their approvals are for the most part perfunctory. If the public wishes to inform the design process effectively, they need to get involved well before the board meets to review projects. All development in MoCo requires community meetings to discuss early project planning. That’s the time to get involved, not at the last minute at a planning board meeting, after countless hours of planning department meetings and design tweaks have already occurred.
Another way to effect change is to get involved in changes to the zoning ordinance and community master plans. To attend a planning board meeting and scream into the microphone that a fully compliant development submission is too damn big, or will block their view, or overload the schools, is just a waste of time.
10:44:
ReplyDeleteDowntown Bethesda has been a high density urban place for quite some time. Increasing the density, adding more folks living within steps of the Metro and driving less (or not at all), creating more energy efficient buildings, adding parks and green-spaces is a very good thing. Bethesda (and most of MoCo) is still filled primarily by single family houses with grass filled yards, flowering shrubs and all that if thats what you want.
What makes downtown Bethesda so special is indeed the high-density, walkable, transit oriented streetscape, filled with places to work, live, shop, dine, bike, and stroll. Thoughtfully enhancing and expanding these elements only strengthens downtown Bethesda.
Now with Hedrick we can look toward a future inspired by Tysons Corner but just without the same level of policing, enforcement, and legal rigor. With that comes, of course, more fraud, payola, weak contracts, inherent in our 'new' State led political coalition.
ReplyDelete10:44 This might come as a surprise, but whatever house and neighborhood you live in was on land carelessly bulldozed and redeveloped, probably much more destructively than current development...but I'm sure that didn't affect your decision to purchase it.
ReplyDeleteThe council and bi-partisan Planning Board have actually done an admirable job of restricting sprawl and concentrating it near transportation corridors, retail, and jobs.
Just look at the difference between Montgomery County and Fairfax County, which is literally wall-to-wall suburbia. Loudoun County is far worse, with a landscape cluttered with ugly windowless data centers and cookie cutter subdivisions.
Meanwhile, MoCo is home to well over a million residents but still has many large county and state parks, trails, forested area, and agricultural land (all of which are preserved and protected indefinitely).
Halting growth is not an option, since it means economic stagnation. Unless you want MoCo to resemble a neglected Rust Belt town, both residential and commercial growth are absolutely necessary. Nobody's forcing you to live in high-density housing, but it's a little selfish to say that it shouldn't be built for anyone else just because you have to look at it. There are plenty of places in Montgomery County to visit, even inside the Beltway, where you can escape the built environment (C&O Canal, Rock Creek Park etc)