Showing posts with label streetcar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label streetcar. Show all posts

Friday, January 25, 2013

NPS ATTEMPTS TO SEIZE PART OF GLEN ECHO STREETCAR RIGHT-OF-WAY

Just 10 months after shipping its historic Glen Echo PCC streetcar off to a scrapyard without public notice, the National Park Service is at it again.

Without wide public notification, NPS has already created a proposal to turn a portion of the streetcar's still-existing right-of-way into a bike trail.

In fact, they've even completed the  environmental assessment at taxpayer expense, before said taxpayers even knew the proposal existed.

It's outrageous.

I thought NPS had no money.  It has been scrapping streetcars and canal boats, and according to the Washington Post, can't even clean the restrooms in its public parks.

So how did they afford to pay for an environmental assessment?

Much as local NIMBYs played a major role in shutting down Glen Echo Amusement Park - and then made sure its amusement rides were never restored, but, rather, demolished - this proposal sounds awfully familiar.

With Washington DC's streetcar revival flourishing, and massive employment growth occurring along the MacArthur Boulevard corridor, the time has never been more right to study restoration of streetcar service to the old Georgetown-Glen Echo-Cabin John right-of-way.

So, wouldn't this be just the right time for NPS to assume its familiar role as NIMBY Protection Service at Glen Echo.

"We're not going to have an amusement park start up in this neighborhood again! And we're not going to have streetcars running through here, either!"

Says who? Says who?

I continue to say we ought to have both. Every single American is paying to maintain Glen Echo Park, but instead of providing joy and entertainment to the masses as it once did, it is essentially a social club for the narrow audience its programming is targeted towards.

Likewise, streetcar service would have environmental and congestion-relieving benefits for large areas on both sides of the Potomac. Why would we provide a benefit to a few with this trail, at the expense of the many?  Doesn't our anti-car, anti-highway county council say we need more transit? Just not in this case?

Something's not right about this. So, as Barney Fife used to say, we've got to nip this in the bud right now.

With no advance notice, I could not attend last night's hush-hush NPS public meeting.

But comment I have, anyway! They always assume the average citizen won't take the time to comment. I say, let's prove them wrong!

Here's the text of my comments (NPS is accepting online comments  through February 8):

# # # # # # # #

I strongly object to the proposed bike trail along part of the historic Glen Echo streetcar right-of-way (ROW).

The most fundamental problem with this proposal is the unnecessary relocation of bike facilities onto the streetcar ROW.  Rail rights-of-way are virtually impossible to obtain in Montgomery County today, both fiscally and practically.

Bike paths and lanes - as demonstrated in the county and in the District - are relatively easy to obtain and locate where space exists.  In contrast, there is no alternative route in this corridor for a streetcar. Therefore, the streetcar ROW must be accommodated in this case. 

This is critically important to any future reinstatement of streetcar operation between Georgetown and Glen Echo (and beyond).

A large residential population in the Palisades and on the county side, the coming expansion of the Sangamore Road intelligence campus, and the rapidly-growing Sibley Hospital campus call for serious consideration of returning streetcars to the still-existing Georgetown-Glen Echo-Cabin John ROW.

Therefore, I am perplexed not only as to why NPS would propose blocking the ROW at this juncture, but why the county council and Planning Board are not strenuously objecting to the plan, as well.

I am also concerned with the arbitrary nature of this sudden proposal. I've known of the need to improve bicycle safety along the MacArthur corridor for years. But I've never heard seizing part of the streetcar facility as a proposed solution before yesterday, January 24.  It was then that I read online that a meeting was being held that evening, which I could not attend on such short notice.

Why was there no published announcement in widely-circulated newspapers, or advance notice via the press? Such poor outreach suggests public input is not welcome.

How did we already get an environmental assessment with no public input as to whether or not the larger, taxpaying public wants this project, or not?

The impression such a closed process presents - accurate or not - is that, once again, a few well-connected citizens are attempting to prevent future streetcar service along part or all of the ROW.  Or that a few cyclists are attempting to appropriate a public resource that holds potential environmental and infrastructure benefits to all, at the expense of the rest of us.

I don't even understand where NPS obtained funds for an environmental assessment when its financial distress is well-known, and it claimed it could not afford to repaint the PCC streetcar last March, and gave it away for scrap.

Given the latter episode, the optics of NPS giving away more of the streetcar legacy - and future potential - are terrible PR-wise and communitywise.

I know that rails-to-trails is a classic NIMBY tactic to stop commuter rail service. As we see in the Purple Line debate today, once a trail goes in, it is extremely unpopular to have it replaced with rail in the future. With the coming growth in this corridor, blocking the streetcar ROW would be highly irresponsible.

Another solution can be found for bicycles in that area. But you are not going to find another streetcar right-of-way.

For that reason, I strongly urge you to scrap plans to utilize any portion of the streetcar right-of-way and creek trestle for bicycling or other vehicular or recreational use.

Limited resources at this time would be better spent cooperating with the DC DOT on a potential extension of DC Streetcar service into Maryland, via the former Glen Echo right-of-way.

Respectfully,

Robert Dyer
Bethesda, MD

Friday, June 29, 2012

WHAT A GEORGETOWN TO GLEN ECHO STREETCAR MIGHT LOOK LIKE

This week's news that the DC streetcar will be extended from Union Station out to Georgetown has fueled speculation about the possibility of it one day reaching Glen Echo.

In recent days, Montgomery County Councilmembers Hans Riemer (who has also advocated having DC streetcars cross into Maryland) and Craig Rice have correctly noted the incompatibility of the proposed BRT system boondoggle with the county's current fiscal situation.

It's clear there simply is neither the revenue, nor the debt capacity, to build the pie in the sky, by and by, BRT network.

This is the time to focus on projects that will actually qualify for federal funds, and which can be built with private investment capital.

Such projects include something as simple as a new parking lot at the Boyds MARC station.  I'm rarely in agreement with developers, but I think there is a lot more potential in the MARC system than we are giving credit to these days.  I was at the council hearing for the bill regarding the issue of development near MARC stations, and Councilmember Riemer spoke correctly on that issue, as well.  To have housing right at a station, while improving MARC service, could certainly take some cars off the road during rush hours, if not during the rest of the day.  In Boyds, you have people who want to ride MARC, but there isn't enough parking.  We should have applied for stimulus money for that project.  That was a missed opportunity.

The Rockville Freeway is a larger project that fits the federal funding/private funding criteria.  This 50-year-old master plan highway, that today would connect exploding employment and residential centers in White Flint and Columbia, would carry more commuters per day than the entire proposed BRT system.  That is a key qualification for federal funding.

Finally, a streetcar line from Georgetown to Glen Echo would qualify, as well.  As I mentioned yesterday, the old streetcar right-of-way is still there, and is already entirely separated from automobile traffic.  This means that the Glen Echo streetcar will literally travel faster than a car making the same trip out MacArthur Boulevard, with red lights and a speed camera-enforced 25 MPH speed limit on that road.

Beyond that huge incentive for ridership - actually reducing your commute time - the Glen Echo right-of-way allows stops to serve major employment centers at Sibley Hospital (currently unserved by rail transit) and, most importantly, the future intelligence campus at the former Geospatial Intelligence Agency site on Sangamore Road.  As you know, there has been a controversy over parking garages there.  Apparently, no one realized the old streetcar right-of-way was the answer!

With the federal government needing to move its employees to and from that campus, they have real, practical reasons to help fund a Glen Echo streetcar.  The speed of the streetcar - possibly the fastest in the nation, on its own right-of-way that is already paid for, no demolitions necessary - is the second major selling point for Uncle Sam.

When you add in the potential partnership with DC, and their plans to build their next streetcar routes with private partnerships, a Glen Echo streetcar project is even more fiscally viable.

If Montgomery County were to share streetcars with DDOT, they might look like this:

Photo: United Streetcar, LLC/Oregon Iron Works


This is the USA-built streetcar DDOT is purchasing from Oregon Iron Works, which kindly sent me this photo to share with you.

Oh, and by the way, the Glen Echo right-of-way allows double-tracking, as the original DC Transit operated two tracks.  So it is all set for that contemporary "must" for rail transit engineers.  The original electrical poles and wires are still in place, and still operating.  All that is needed is to clear the brush from some sections, and install the overhead catenary, and we are back in business.

With no Metro route serving this corridor, a streetcar line makes abundant good sense, as Rick Perry would say, from both a transportation and fiscal standpoint.  It would not cause "sprawl," because it travels through some of the most dense residential neighborhoods in the DC area.  Neighborhoods currently underserved by transit.  Not to mention that a Park-and-Ride lot could be built right off the Beltway near the old Cabin John streetcar turnaround, for even greater ridership.

This is such a great concept, and worked so well in the past, I'm surprised no one is taking action on it.

Thursday, June 28, 2012

DC STREETCAR INCHING TOWARD GEORGETOWN ...AND THEN TO GLEN ECHO?

More exciting streetcar news from Washington, DC:   Mayor Vincent Gray and DDOT are actively pursuing a future streetcar line that replicates a famous one, Union Station to Georgetown.

One question is whether or not the route will travel along M Street.

The important point for those of us out here in Bethesda, is for the streetcar to climb the hill up to Prospect Street from M Street.

That will connect the streetcar to a possible future extension to Glen Echo.  After turning left on Prospect towards Georgetown University, the streetcar would gain access to the original - and still existing - right of way that goes all the way to Cabin John.

A streetcar traveling between Georgetown and Glen Echo would be the fastest trolley line in the region, if not the nation.  That's because the entire right of way, with the exception of a few blocks in a residential Palisades neighborhood, is off-road.  Separated from auto traffic, the streetcar will be faster than a car, a clear advantage for commuters that will ensure boosted ridership.

The Georgetown to Glen Echo streetcar is an idea whose time has come... again!

Monday, June 18, 2012

DC MOVES FORWARD WITH H STREET STREETCAR AS MONTGOMERY COUNTY GOES OFF RAILS WITH BRT

Big streetcar news was announced quietly on a Saturday by the DC Department of Transportation:  DDOT has awarded a partnership of M.C. Dean, Inc. and Facchina Construction the design-construction contract for the H Street-Benning Road streetcar line.

Dean-Facchina will build the western and eastern termini of the route, the overhead catenary that will deliver power to the streetcars, and the Benning Road-26th Street, NE car barn.

Work will begin immediately once DDOT issues the paperwork, pending council approval, according to Director Terry Bellamy.  The timing will keep the streetcar on schedule to start service in late 2013.

If you're a streetcar fan, you've got to be excited just to hear a phrase like "car barn" again.

Much like the Purple Line (and at one time, the light rail concept of the now-ruined Corridor Cities Transitway) here in Montgomery County, the H Street streetcar is a targeted expenditure, bringing the benefits of rail transit to serve a route expected to grow in density.

Contrast that with the scattershot boondoggle known as Montgomery County BRT, which duplicates existing Metro routes, lacks the density to support it according to the county's own master planner, is slower and costlier than rail, and has no responsible financing.

With BRT, the county is literally going off the rails.  And wasting money that could have been better spent on a light rail CCT, on its own right-of-way as originally planned.  Or purchasing more Red Line or MARC capacity.  Or funding a new parking lot at the Boyds MARC station, where more commuters actually want to take the train, but have no parking!

Or cooperating with DC on restarting the streetcar line from Georgetown out to Glen Echo.

We still have the right-of-way for the whole Glen Echo route; do we have the leadership to create a modern transportation system in Montgomery County?

BRT rush-to-ruin tells serious transit advocates we don't.

Wednesday, May 02, 2012

GLEN ECHO PARK, NPS: THEY'RE WITH "STUPID" ON STREETCAR GIVEAWAY

CURSORY SALE PROCESS RAISES
QUESTIONS ABOUT GSA PROPERTY
REMOVAL PROCEDURE,
PARTNERSHIP BOARD INVOLVEMENT

The Glen Echo streetcar story made The Washington Post yesterday.  And as I predicted Friday, we are going to learn more and more about this fiasco as time goes on.

My scoop that the General Services Administration tried to sell the People's Streetcar on eBay was solid.  Try as they might, Glen Echo and the National Park Service have to admit it happened.  And fortunately, the evidence was presented here on this blog for all to examine.

One new bit of information to come out of John Kelly's column, is that there was in fact a monetary sale made, by the GSA to General Machine.

But it was a "stupid" price, according to Ken Rinehart, CEO of General Machine.  The clear interpretation in this context, is that it was a joke of a low price.  A giveaway, essentially.  Surprising, given the GSA's eBay demand of $30,000 minimum.

This raises questions about the whole sale process.

I am not an expert on GSA "property removal" procedure.  Whatever it consists of, was it followed in this case?  And if it was, is it flawed?  Because if the GSA handled all government property sales this way, wouldn't it have cost the country a fortune in lost sales revenue?

First of all, when the streetcar issue came up, what involvement did the Glen Echo Partnership Board have in this debate?  Who concluded that sending the streetcar off for scrap was an acceptable option?

Second, should NPS have to solicit at least three estimates for the restoration cost for the streetcar before making a final decision?

Third, once the mystery decisionmaker(s) decided to give up on the car, what were the GSA guidelines for the sale process?

One would think that the selling of government property would first invilve establishing the market value of the property.

If the GSA placed an overpriced listing on eBay, and then gave up and sold it for a "stupid" price, that would almost certainly indicate that the GSA did not bother to determine the market price of this particular piece of government property.  Is that legal?  Again, if such a casual process is truly legal and standard practice, how much did such underselling cost the American people last year?

Consider that Friends of Philadelphia Trolleys and the San Diego Vintage Trolley Line wanted to assist in raising restoration funds and/or adopting the streetcar.  Instead, the NPS bypassed that opportunity 3 years ago, and placed the car - which belonged to you, me and every other American - into private, for-profit hands.  And, according to Rinehart's interview with Kelly, those non-profits will now have to pay him a "price" in order to adopt the streetcar.

Wow.  Do you realize what happened there?

A couple other of points:  We, the People owned this car, and were never alerted or consulted about the pending sale to private hands.  Sunshine laws, anyone?

And ultimately, what was the idea in allowing the car to decline in the first place?  Why should the streetcar and its supporters get a raw deal, if park stewards willfully neglected this piece of public property they were given responsibility for?

How come we haven't heard word one from Glen Echo's appointed board on this matter?

It's all quite troubling.  You can't blame Rinehart in the least in this situation.

When NPS says it would like to acquire a "real" Glen Echo trolley (yeah, there are a lot of those around.  Hee Haw.), you first have to laugh.

But this debacle is more serious then that  The fact is that, while I'd definitely like the DC area to acquire any DC streetcar it can, the SEPTA car was actually more valuable - having been refurbished in 1985, it was in great running condition when it arrived at Glen Echo.  The GSA rated its interior 89 out of 100 on eBay (which totally contradicts the NPS claim of expensive interior renovation being necessary).  It had all new wiring.

In short, the car we lost could actually have been brought to life and run.

That's worth way more than a "stupid" price.

As a result, we lost our streetcar, and the American people lost the difference between the "stupid" price and the true market price (there being such, since both San Diego and San Francisco restore and operate PCC streetcars just like this).

Bottom line:  What did they know, and when did they know it?

Friday, April 27, 2012

WHAT GLEN ECHO'S STREETCAR COULD HAVE BEEN

ARDENT SUITORS EMERGING FOR PARK'S
NOW-IN-SCRAPYARD TROLLEY SUGGEST
NPS DID NOT REACH OUT TO LOCAL,
NATIONAL RESTORATION GROUPS

Another Robert Dyer @Bethesda Row Exclusive!!!

Behold what could have been.  Isn't it a beauty?  The streetcar pictured is the exact same model as the Glen Echo trolley was, but after a complete refurbishment funded by Friends of Philadelphia Trolleys.

Photo courtesy Harry Donahue/FPT
SEPTA #2168 is pictured here at the Baltimore Streetcar Museum - head on over and pay it a visit sometime!

This, too, served the Philadelphia area for decades as a member of the SEPTA fleet.  Just like our Glen Echo streetcar, which was hauled away without public notice Tuesday.  A day that will live in infamy.

Had Glen Echo Park and the National Park Service simply reached out to FPT - and remember, FPT even contacted Glen Echo and NPS three years ago, in hopes of sparing the Glen Echo car the scrapyard storage fate it met this week - our PCC could be in this same, assembly-line new condition today.  Or actually operating on the streets of San Diego.  Instead it is now imprisoned at a scrapyard.  It's outrageous.

Families arriving at Saturday's "Family Day" at Glen Echo Park will truly be in for a shock.  "Mommy, Daddy, the streetcar is gone!"  Maybe they'll tell kids Santa Claus doesn't exist, too, while they're at it!  These are sad times at underutilized Glen Echo Park.  But good times for the spoilsports who want to ensure that average people from Maryland, Virginia and DC can't take a streetcar out for a day of Old-Fashioned fun at Glen Echo amusement park.  Oh, no, we couldn't have that!  The horror!  

Those types, who work with politicians behind closed doors, are the same ones who got the Georgetown Branch railroad torn up real fast - at huge expense (and keep in mind, the Chessie System had just upgraded the tracks a few years earlier after inheriting them from the B&O).

They're glad the streetcar is gone.  Maybe it will mean less kids will get curious about the history of the park.  Less crazy ideas about supporting a restoration of the streetcar line and park.  Here, kid, forget about fun and the All-American amusement park summer experiences your grandparents and great-grandparents had - start working on these arts and crafts!

Unfortunately, they're outnumbered by the rest of us.  And from the feedback I've gotten on my coverage of this, people are plenty upset about losing our streetcar.

NPS acknowledges that suitors for the streetcar are asking them to help them contact the scrapyard CEO.  They want the trolley.  It proves that NPS did not do any real advertising or outreach.  If they had, these same people would have responded with funding or adoption plans.  Restoration experts are apalled and dismayed at not only the neglect of the car over the last several years, but that such a valuable piece of history could end up in a scrapyard when it is wanted - for use - by so many.

We're going to learn more each day about how this all came about, and I'm definitely going to keep all of you posted here as I receive new information. And as we do what we can to:

1. Have the streetcar returned to Glen Echo or to another home where it will be appreciated and enjoyed by many.

2.  Get a replacement PCC for Glen Echo Park.

3.  Advocate for restoration of streetcar service between DC and Glen Echo Park on the original, existing right-of-way.

4.  Advocate for a full restoration of Glen Echo Park and historic replicas of its legendary rides and attractions, and as a revenue generator for Montgomery County.

So we're thinking positive, not negative here, right?

And consider this:  more people in the DC area are aware of Washington's and Glen Echo's streetcar history than they were 72 hours ago.  And more people are finding out about the amazing groups of volunteers like FPT, and hopefully they'll consider supporting their efforts.  That's something good that's come out of this.  And just getting people thinking that Glen Echo Park could be so much more than it is today - that's a step forward.

In closing, here are a couple of links passed on to me by streetcar advocates you might want to check out:

San Diego Vintage Trolley - this is the line that wanted the Glen Echo PCC.

Chicago Streetcar Renaissance - working to return streetcars to the Windy City.

Have a great weekend, and check out the other blog entries, and follow me on Twitter at @BethesdaRow to find out what's going on in Bethesda tonight - including an actual movie star at Bethesda Row Cinema this evening!



Thursday, April 26, 2012

EXCLUSIVE: NON-PROFIT TRIED TO RESCUE GLEN ECHO STREETCAR 3 YEARS AGO, WAS REBUFFED BY NPS

SAN DIEGO PRESERVATION GROUP
WANTED TO GIVE A HOME TO
PARK'S NEGLECTED TROLLEY,
MOVED TO CHEVERLY SCRAPYARD
TUESDAY

Another Robert Dyer @ Bethesda Row Exclusive!!!

The plot, as they say, thickens.  As I reported yesterday, Glen Echo Park's beloved 1947 PCC streetcar was abruptly hauled away by a scrap metal company, by order of the National Park Service and the GSA.  This after the GSA tried to sell the trolley on Ebay (as you can tell from yesterday's entry, I'm not making this up, folks!).

The NPS initially did not respond to my inquiry Tuesday, and gave an "exclusive" to The Gazette, which printed an NPS-centric version of events.  Needless to say, the additional exclusive details I uncovered were not quite as flattering to Glen Echo and the NPS.

Wednesday, I finally got a response by contacting the park manager.

I am still waiting for some follow-up communications today about questions that remain unanswered.  NPS and Glen Echo should hardly be surprised that people who care about streetcars and history are understandably upset about the way this was handled.  

Right now, what I've heard from NPS gives me more questions than answers.

One disturbing point is that the NPS apparently sent the streetcar off believing it would be destroyed for scrap metal.  In fact, it was sent to a scrapyard.  The scrapyard owner, however, is quoted saying he wants to keep and restore the car in his scrapyard.  It's entirely possible that the purchaser paid nothing for the car but the cost of moving it.

But this is where it gets interesting.  The NPS has claimed it attempted to raise funds to restore the car, and that it could not afford what it said is a $100,000 restoration of SEPTA Car 2732.

Later, among the feedback I received on yesterday's post, was a very interesting and enlightening email from Harry Donahue of Friends of Philadelphia Trolleys.  Needless to say, these folks know SEPTA trolleys, and are a far more authoritative source than NPS on restoration.

Remember the claims of failing to find donors, $100,000 restoration fees, and there being no alternative but to have the GSA "remove excess government property," a.k.a. the People's Streetcar?

The NPS statement said, "We had sought grants to restore the streetcar...two different donors expressed interest...Each of them later changed their minds."  Ultimately, NPS says, no money was available.

But according to Donahue, FPT "tried to rescue this car 3 years ago."

He says that the San Diego Electric Railway Association would have loved to adopt the Glen Echo streetcar at that time, and still wants it today.

"Unfortunately, we could get no answers from Glen Echo/NPS," wrote Donahue, adding that they sent an FPT member to the park in person, "to no avail."

The claim of $100,000 restoration by NPS?  Donahue's group has restored another SEPTA PCC for the Baltimore Streetcar Museum for "just under $40,000."  He included a photo, and SEPTA car #2168 literally looks like it just rolled off the assembly line!  Incredible work.

As far as outreach to the public or streetcar fans and restoration groups?  Yesterday, I challenged the NPS to show us the articles or ads to prove these efforts, because I've heard not a single word that we were in danger of losing our streetcar.

It turns out that FPT's sole mission is raising money to restore former Philadelphia streetcars - of which our #2732 was one!

Did NPS reach out to this most logical source of funds?

"We never heard anything (about NPS) seeking funding for #2732," reports Donahue.

I think NPS and the directors of Glen Echo have more explaining to do.  Particularly the way this was handled.

It's a sad day in Glen Echo and Bethesda without our streetcar.  But very heartening to hear from this group and Mr. Donahue, who are doing all of this work for free to restore streetcars, so that history can be remembered, and for the enjoyment of others.  FPT's work helps to create new generations of streetcar fans each day.  I hope people consider supporting this and other preservation groups.

The information he has shared is extremely helpful, as we in the community try to get answers about how and why we lost our streetcar, and were not consulted about its sale/giveaway - when we, the People, own it!

To summarize, we had a fully operational PCC streetcar, Glen Echo and NPS neglected it, NPS ignored offers from groups who would restore the damage so it could remain at Glen Echo, and - if not - even had a specific home for it in San Diego where it was wanted, and would actually be run on an active streetcar line(!!)...

And, instead, the streetcar is spirited away with no public warning, and now sits in a scrapyard?

What is this world coming to, ladies and gentlemen?

It's outrageous.

SEPTA #2732 - and Bethesda - deserve better.  The indignity!

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

GLEN ECHO STREETCAR HAULED AWAY WITHOUT PUBLIC NOTICE!

1947 PCC SEPTA CAR GONE FOR
GOOD, THANKS TO... THE GSA?!

EXCLUSIVE DETAILS YOU WON'T
FIND ANYWHERE ELSE!

Another Robert Dyer @ Bethesda Row Exclusive!!!

Glen Echo Park is a ruin and shell of its former self.  Only a handful of powerful symbols remain of its past glory, such as the famous carousel.  What a shock it was yesterday to find out another such symbol has been stolen away:  the 1947 PCC Streetcar, from its place of honor at the gate to the park.

No public announcement was made regarding the trolley by either the Glen Echo board or the National Park Service.  As a fan of just about anything on rails, I am a streetcar buff.  My favorite streetcar is the DC Transit PCC.   I had actually planned to take some pictures and video of the PCC at Glen Echo in the near future for this very reason - that it might suddenly be taken away.

Imagine my horror when Justin Fidler tweeted a photo yesterday morning, showing the old PCC being spirited out of town.  Apparently, Glen Echo thought they could do this quietly, and by the time people noticed, it would be gone.  Fortunately, they were caught in the act on camera.

Now, I have to note that this is not the tragedy it would have been if the car had actually been an original DC Transit PCC.  This car was a veteran of Philadelphia's SEPTA system - which has its own rich history (score yourself bonus points if you know what a "flying coffin" is on the Main Line).

That said...  Once I received word of this legal heist of the People's Streetcar, I was immediately on the case.  Within minutes, I had dashed off an email to Glen Echo Park.  In addition to asking for an explanation of yesterday's events, I reminded them that Glen Echo - the town and the park - only exist because of the streetcar.  To remove the only prominent symbol of that legacy is outrageous.  

Strangely, even though I emailed them long before the close of business, I received no response from Glen Echo.  When I wrote the lettter, I still had some hope that the streetcar was going to be refurbished.  It had been left to rust by Glen Echo and NPS, which was shameful.

But as my investigation continued, that hope was dashed.

I knew it was a 1947 SEPTA PCC, so I started searching on the internet.  Alas, I found a bulletin board discussion from last week with bad news:  Apparently, the smart NPS ranger who arranged for Glen Echo to acquire the car is no longer at the park.  Push has come to shove, apparently, and the streetcar was determined expendable.

Yet, Glen Echo never alerted the community.  Certainly, there are enough streetcar enthusiasts in the DC area to raise funds to give the old PCC a new coat of paint.  Yet, they did not engage them.  They made no public effort to keep it there.

Here's the best (or worst) part:

The GSA - yes, that GSA - tried to sell our Glen Echo streetcar on Ebay.  Ebay!

Stay classy, GSA.  Just don't stay at any more Vegas resorts at taxpayer expense.

Apparently, the GSA drives a much harder bargain when they're selling, than when they're buying conferences and handbags.  Their asking price was $30,000.  Now, I'm a huge streetcar fan, but not an expert on them.  Even I know that $30,000 is way above the real price of a '47 PCC.  In fact, some of the more knowledgable folks on the internet say they can go for $250-$5000 these days.

In the message board discussion, one person asserted the PCC was operational when Glen Echo acquired it.  Its current operational status is unknown.  I know the rust has been increasing over time.

Anyway, the Ebay auction failed to draw a buyer.

Then we jump to yesterday's haulaway.  So what happened?

Well, it turns out the NPS decided to ignore my email yesterday, and tried to give the exclusive to, at a minimum, The Gazette.  The Gazette is now reporting that exclusive given to it by NPS,  stating that the streetcar was sold to General Machine and Tool Company of Cheverly.

This kind of thing happens sometimes, particularly with government stories.  They will shut out a blogger like me, and give a corporate media outlet (or outlets) an exclusive.  My guess is they think the coverage will be favorable, if the media outlet knows they'll get scoops in the future.  I don't know why they didn't respond; that's just a guess on my part.

But when somebody disses me, I don't get discouraged; I get energized and work harder.

And that's how I got the exclusive details and links above.  As you may have noticed, the details I uncovered are not quite as flattering to Glen Echo and NPS.  I don't think they wanted you to know they tried to peddle our streetcar on Ebay!

Furthermore, the Gazette printed the NPS assertion that it would cost $100,000 to refurbish the streetcar.  That sounds pretty exaggerated to me, considering the car's Ebay listing says the interior is 89% in good shape.  And that it basically needs a rust treatment and paint job for display purposes.  $100,000?  Please.

Even worse, the Gazette didn't fact check the NPS claim that the agency had made "failed attempts to raise money" to keep the streetcar.  I've been right here in Bethesda all along.  If I had heard the word "streetcar," believe me, I would have noticed it!  I challenge NPS to produce the local newspaper article(s) and/or advertisement(s) asking for donations to restore the trolley.  I think we'll be waiting a good, long time for NPS to produce those.  Forever, most likely.

It's pretty sad when a government agency funded by the taxpayer can't answer a highly relevant email from a taxpayer by the close of business.  It says something about their regard for the public.  And that's one of the reasons Glen Echo Park continues to be an underperforming resource, when it was - and could again be - a national treasure providing enjoyment for the masses.

What a statement, when NPS sells off a streetcar, when Glen Echo was created by and for the streetcar!  It's absolutely absurd, and the public had a right to know.  We the public owned that trolley, and we should be notified of its sale in advance.  And once again, our elected officials failed to intervene, just as they have with the wacky choice for the new Bethesda Post Office.

The sale of this streetcar is the last straw in Glen Echo's long decline, as far as I'm concerned.  This is a turning point, if we in the community can make our voices heard.

Frankly, today I want to start a serious, public conversation on the future of Glen Echo Park and the importance of the streetcar line that extended to it from Georgetown.  The fact that Glen Echo, the NPS and the GSA would just sell one of the only historic symbols at the park, is just the latest example of intentional decline there.

Glen Echo Park is a wasted resource, refashioned as a niche arts and crafts spot with appeal to a very narrow audience.  And that was an intentional devolution by the community and the powers that be.

What I've wondered for years is, why can't Glen Echo Park be restored to glory?   Not as a Six Flags, but in its original dimensions, with accurate replicas of its historic attractions.  The spectacular roller coaster.  The bumper cars.  The Crystal Pool.  The Tunnel of Love.  And so many more.

A place of the sort we don't have in Montgomery County, and frankly, anywhere in the immediate DC area.  A place where families can go, or where a young person can take a date.

And a potential revenue source, if Montgomery County were to buy the park, perhaps in a public-private partnership.  Clearly the current stewards have little interest in the park's massively-undertapped potential.

All of the drive-in theaters, miniature golf courses, and nearly all of the bowling alleys are gone.  For all the talk about making the county appealing to young people, and reducing long automobile trips, we insist on sending them elsewhere for most entertainment.

The critical piece of the restoration of Glen Echo Park would be the restoration of the Glen Echo (Cabin John) streetcar line.  Believe it or not, the right-of-way is still there from Prospect Street and Georgetown University, through the elite bastion of The Palisades, and out through the woods to Glen Echo.  Parts of the trestle remain.  And, of course, DC is launching a streetcar system.  The potential to cooperate on a Glen Echo route is there.  (Although, wouldn't it be great to run a couple of restored PCCs on the route, instead of those red toaster ovens DC is planning to use?  The PCC has something they don't: character and style.  I'm hoping the next set of USA-built cars DC is buying will have a better exterior design).

I haven't met a senior citizen yet who doesn't have fond memories of the old Glen Echo Park, and of the streetcar ride there several described as "more exciting than the rides in the park."

When you consider those memories of Glen Echo and a similar park at Chevy Chase Lake, you realize that the plans put forward by developers today suggest a future less engaging than the past.  Which should be a red flag that our planning is going in the wrong direction.

Was there some point that drive-in movies, miniature golf and amusement parks stopped being fun?  Of course not.  So why did our great-grandparents have more fun things to do in Montgomery County than we do today?  If that isn't a devolution, what is?  Not surprisingly, developers had a big part in this coming about.

But we have the power to change this.

And one small first start, is to bring a PCC streetcar back to the gates of Glen Echo.   Let's hope the GSA's streetcar profits aren't going to their next Vegas getaway.


Tuesday, February 07, 2012

PRAISE FOR METRO,
DC STREETCARS
FROM
CANADA, EH

You think you've got it bad! Metro is in serious trouble. Endless track work will continue indefinitely, yet all the work done so far has yielded no tangible or quantifiable benefit discernable to riders. Stations will be closed again on weekends. Riders are returning to cars in droves, even as ridership rises in other cities.

Metro's solution? Charge more than it costs most people to drive for a daily round trip. That should win people over!

I still love our Metro system and its distinctive architecture. It is actually a real subway inside most of DC, which has become a lost art in transit. When did planners suddenly decide that underground subways were obsolete? They allow convenient routing through developed areas without demolitions, offer optimal station placement, travel faster than light rail, create no mess of wires and equipment on urban streets, and are protected from bad weather.

The fact is that developer-beholden politicians don't want to spend subway money, even as they want to facilitate transit-oriented-development everywhere possible. This is how you end up with BRT and light rail. And a Metro Silver Line with no parking for actual human beings who might use it.

So it's not surprising to hear negative reactions to a new subway proposed in Toronto. But you might be surprised to hear praise from Canada for the DC area's rail transit system.

A gent named Peter Witt responded to a comment section debate on a Toronto website with this advice:

"Try visiting Washington, D.C., a metro region the size of the GTA (Greater Toronto Area) where they are BUILDING FIVE STREETCAR LINES IN A CITY WHOSE SUBWAY SYSTEM KICKS THE TTC'S (Toronto Subway's) (fill in the blank). Aargh."

Sounds like things could be worse. While advocating for completion of our highway and transit system, sometimes you have to stop and marvel at our Metro system and Capital Beltway: impressive achievements that apparently could not be built today.