Thursday, June 02, 2016

Equity One unveils sketch plan for Westbard redevelopment (Photos)

County Council
lied to public
about building heights,
Ridgefield Rd.
realignment

Developer Equity One unveiled its sketch plan for the 22 acres of property it plans to redevelop in the Westbard area of Bethesda at a public meeting last night. Equity One's Mike Berfield said the company expects the Planning Board to take up the plan this fall, and for construction to begin in the 1st Quarter of 2018.

The project will be built in four phases, likely to start with the first of three retail buildings on the current Westwood Shopping Center site. That 60,000+ SF structure is expected to house the anchor tenant, an expanded Giant Food store. Berfield confirmed rumors that Giant is seeking to avoid closing the current store before the new one is ready to open. He said that while that may be the ideal scenario, the logistics of whether that is possible are not fully worked out yet, so the Giant staging remains to-be-determined at this point.
Residents line up to
ask questions
What came to light during the presentation, is that the Montgomery County Council lied to their constituents. In fact, Equity One has been more honest throughout the process than the Council and Planning Board. You may recall that in early 2015, at a media preview for the concept plan, I asked Berfield if heights would have to increase if the Council demanded more affordable units.

Berfield didn't dodge the question, and was completely candid in his response, saying that increased height would be a possibility if the Council went beyond the 12.5% MPDU requirement.

In contrast, councilmembers repeatedly told the community at worksessions that there would be no need to add another floor to any building if 15% affordable units were required.

Now, if you've been reading my blog all along, you will not be at all surprised to find out that at least one floor is being added to two buildings. You'll recall I warned you several times that whatever height was assigned by the Council was only a starting point. The Council forcefully denied that, clearly stating that 110' was the maximum. Period.

They lied.

One building that will be in front of the existing Westwood Tower high-rise will increase from 75' to 85', and a second multifamily building that will combine the Bowlmor and Citgo II sites will increase from 110' to 122'.

You also may recall that Councilmember Roger Berliner, and the Council as a whole in endorsing his "Berliner alternative" Westbard plan, told us that Springfield would be getting the realigned Ridgefield Road as part of the sector plan. This was to reduce cut-through traffic to the Springfield neighborhood, and to solve the existing problem of semi trucks not having the required turning radius to properly turn right from eastbound River Road onto Ridgefield.

The realignment was a major reason the Citizens Coordinating Committee on Friendship Heights endorsed the plan, an endorsement Berliner waved in the final weeks of the Westbard debate.

But now it may not happen. "We can't 100% commit to that," Berfield told residents last night. "At this point, we haven't spent enough time with the [County and state] agencies that would have to sign off on that." He said an agency like Pepco or the State Highway Administration could nix the realignment, for example. "Everyone anticipates it's going to happen," Berfield said, but a commitment can't be made at this stage.

And once again, it was the Council, not Equity One, who fooled the public. Equity One has said all along that they would like to do it if it was possible; they never committed to doing it. The Council, by contrast, said it was happening, and like the Planning Board, endorsed giving additional height to the Westwood Center II site on Ridgefield Road as compensation for losing buildable space that would be dedicated to the new road's right-of-way.

"That's why the Berliner plan was a ruse," resident Margie Eulner Ott said to sustained applause from the crowd later in the evening.

Now what may happen is, Ridgefield Road stays where it is. Trucks continue to struggle making the turn from River. Traffic will continue to cut through the neighborhood further up Ridgefield. And now the 75' building will be even closer to the single-family homes that sit across the street from the site, and further down Westbard. So the Council lied, and unless the realignment happens, they literally made the situation worse.

Resident Lee Janger followed up on this point later in the evening. If Equity One doesn't realign Ridgefield, he asked, will they still build up to the 75' they were given in exchange for the road shift? Yes, Berfield replied. "That's what the zoning allows." Janger asked where the height of 75' would be measured from. The ground level of the building is a story below its frontage onto Westbard Avenue. Berfield said the County has rules that determine that, but they haven't been applied to that particular property yet.

A third point I can't really direct at the Council is the doubt now surrounding the proposed naturalization of Willett Branch. Berfield noted that it was not listed as an amenity in the plan because it is now a public project for the County. The reason I can't say the Council lied, is because they actually admitted they were dropping the Willett Branch as a priority in the sector plan. But the Planning Board did lie, because it was one of the primary amenities they touted in the plan they sent to the Council.

One amenity that Berfield did talk about was the much-discussed shuttle, which would travel between the Equity One properties and the Friendship Heights and/or Bethesda Metro stations. There is no language that absolutely requires Equity One to operate this shuttle, and the Council declined to add such language. Which is quite laughable, when you consider these "transit advocates" claim that all of the developments they are approving will have a large number of transit users. And what do they do? Not require a shuttle, and delete the proposed transit center from the Equity One site! Complete phonies.

Berfield said that this is stage in the process where Equity One can commit to the shuttle. He said it would be free to use, and open to anyone. Schedules and routes have not yet been determined at this point.

Before taking questions from the large crowd at The Ballroom, Berfield also confirmed another report that's been making the rounds in the Westbard area. He said he is "transitioning out of Equity One," after having been the main point of contact between the publicly-traded firm and the community. Bill Brown is taking over in his place.

Residents lined up for a sometimes contentious but respectful dialogue on the plan.

The first resident to speak said he found it "puzzling" that proponents of the Westbard sector plan had referred to Metro so much. He said that subway system is "unpleasant, unreliable, and now definitely unsafe."

Westbard is well over a mile from the Friendship Heights and Bethesda Metro stations, but that didn't stop folks like Councilmember Hans Riemer from claiming it was "just a mile from two Metros." Are these folks pathological liars, or did Riemer cast his vote for the plan with bad information from his staff? Do tell! But I'm detecting a pattern here, aren't you?

Berfield said Metro's woes would have no bearing on Equity One's plan.

How many acres will the civic green be, another resident asked. Berfield said it would be about 1/3 of an acre, which elicited laughter from the crowd. "That's a joke!" one resident shouted.

Asked about the timeline for the construction, Berfield said the first Westwood Shopping Center phase would take two to three years to build out, with the aforementioned Q1 2018 start of construction on that site.

Ott suggested putting a 3-D model of the sketch plan on the New Westwood Facebook page. "It's easy to do, it's cheap," she said.

Will parking be free?

"I never like to say forever, but the intent is that parking is free," Berfield said. There may be a necessity for time restrictions to prevent Metro users from parking on the site and taking the free shuttle to Metro in the morning, he added.

Concern for the future of the popular small businesses in the Westwood Shopping Center remains on the front burner for their customers. "75 people work in that shopping center," a Sumner resident noted, asking Berfield what will happen to them now. Will they be able to come back?

"Yes, we've talked about this with retailers," Berfield said. He said any existing tenant will be offered a new lease at the existing rent "plus C.P.I. increases." However, Berfield added, "we can't promise that they will be able to operate during construction."

In an interview after the meeting, the owners of Fashion Craft Cleaners said all they are asking for is a letter of commitment from Equity One, so that they can plan for what's ahead. They employ 11 people, who would be out of a job if the shop has to close. The dry cleaners has been a fixture in the center for 32 years.

Other "mom and pop" shops in the center, including Westwood Pet Center and Anglo Dutch Pools and Toys, are in a similar position of uncertainty at the moment. Some, like Beyda's Lad and Lassie, simply decided to close rather than deal with the upheaval and uncertainty.

A resident of Sumner had another very important question - where will the construction workers park? Berfield said they will park on Equity One's property. Similarly, the routes of construction vehicles are a concern. Berfield said Equity One will "make sure trucks take appropriate routes," rather than cut through residential areas.

Helen Burns of Sumner asked what the total number of units will be at full build-out on the Equity One land. Berfield said, "It's hard to know exactly" at this stage, but he said it could be in the 650 to 850 range including the future Housing Opportunities Commission projects. By comparison, the adjacent Springfield neighborhood has about 600 households, and Sumner has 500.

The lack of any designs showing how Equity One is "going to interface your buildings with the [Willett Branch] Greenway," was a red flag for Sarah Morse of the Little Falls Watershed Alliance. She asked if there was any plan to incorporate the envisioned stream project with the new development, as was done in downtown Frederick with Carroll Creek.

Berfield said his company really only has a small portion along the stream, at Westwood Center II. He said it's Park and Planning's project to determine, not Equity One's. "We're waiting for Park and Planning...before we can do anything," Berfield said.

Sumner resident Sid Clemens said the Council "told us no one ever builds to the max. Are you guys going to back down a little bit" from what the sector plans permits, he asked. "People here are pretty mad," he added to applause. Berfield replied that he final site plan could end up being different. "The reality is, we've gotten huge amounts of support for this plan," Berfield said. That elicited laughter from the audience, given that the overwhelming majority of the community has opposed the density and height of the residential component of the plan in every public forum.

A Kenwood resident asked if Equity One would "work with us" to prevent additional cut-through traffic in that community. She predicted a "ten-fold increase in traffic." Will there be restaurants, she asked, citing additional after-hours traffic related to those as a concern. Berfield said that many see dining and the related evening activity as a positive. He asked if there was a particular restaurant she would like to have in the new center. She did not suggest one, but I will suggest a restaurant from the Great American Restaurant group, if anybody is listening. She did offer an opinion on the the appearance of the townhomes, which are just shown as boxes lined up in the sketch plan. The townhome configuration "reminds me of quonset huts on a military base," she said to laughter.

Resident Susan Spock asked if it has been determined where the affordable units will go in the various buildings across the 22 acres. That "hasn't been decided yet," Berfield replied. "I'm really unhappy with the way you've dealt with the stream and Ridgefield Road," Spock said. She suggested Equity One commit to those even if they don't have control over the outcome. "You're really not living up to the amenities stated in the plan" (I would add that this could be said of the Council and Planning Board). Berfield said HOC controls more of the stream buffer than his firm. They have a ground lease that runs until nearly the year 2100, and are expected to exercise their option to purchase Westwood Tower and the land around it from Equity One.

At the Bowlmore site, Berfield said, the drop is too steep to give Equity One much if anything to offer along that stretch of the Willett Branch.

Resident Stan Wiggins asked Berfield if he was aware of the large tax cut for developers that's being proposed by the planning department. A tax cut of 50-60% would suggest that somehow the cost of providing school infrastructure has been reduced by that amount in just a year or two, Wiggins said. "Have you heard why they think this?"

"No," Berfield replied.

Attorney Michelle Rosenfeld asked why the power lines along Westbard are not going to be buried as part of the redevelopment, a common practice today. "It's a challenging issue to bury them underground," Berfield said. He said Equity One is still examining the possibility, but that he could not promise it would happen.

Sumner resident Phil Wilcox questioned if there is a market for this much retail in the area, noting that there are currently many vacancies in Westwood Center II.

A resident of Kenwood Place finished off the night (and this article) by asking if the footprint of the underground parking garage had changed for the Westwood Shopping Center site. Yes, it has, Berfield said. It will no longer extend beneath the townhomes behind the retail buildings. Whether that means there has been a reduction in spaces was not immediately clear. Berfield promised that the necessary parking would come online as the various retail buildings come online. There will also be a certain amount of surface parking on the property, he added.



Public use/open space plan
Orange represents public space
(including green space/park areas);
green represents open space
Civic green denoted by green
area on map at right
One "civic green" concept
being used to model the future
one at the new
Westwood Shopping Center

Neighborhood green located
near the spot where
Montgomery County failed
to deliver a promised park
in the 1980s

Use this color key to
read the map of street types
below

Traffic circulation
plan shows two new
traffic signals between
Ridgefield and
Park Bethesda




Phasing plan:
Retail first (1A-C), then
townhomes behind (2A-C),
then Manor Care (3A) and
finally the large buildings
on the opposite side of Westbard
(4A-D)

Equity One image of
rendering of
The New Westwood
(all other photos except this
by Robert Dyer)

Purple Line claims second business casualty in 3 days in Bethesda (Photos)

Bank panic!

The Purple Line has claimed its second victim in the downtown Bethesda business community in three days. United Bank accepted its final transactions in the historic Community Paint and Hardware building at 7250 Wisconsin Avenue in downtown Bethesda midday Wednesday. At 2:00 PM, the bank closed its doors forever.

By early evening, the bank's signage had been stripped, and the building was literally boarded up. Customers were redirected to the United branch at 7845 Wisconsin Avenue. All accounts here have been consolidated there.

The Purple Line light rail project is quickly becoming a proven job killer in Bethesda, as the restaurant next door, Food Wine & Co., closed forever Sunday night. Its ownership cited the Purple Line specifically as the reason for its closure. That business was in the Apex Building at 7272 Wisconsin, which will be demolished at an undetermined date in the future to make way for a Purple Line station. The new owner, Carr Properties, took possession of the building recently. It has put forward a promising redevelopment plan.

“We believe that the Apex site, as redeveloped, will be the new commercial hub of the Bethesda market with unparalleled access to public transportation, bike trails and the thriving restaurant and retail of Bethesda Row. We could not be more excited about this opportunity for our company,” Oliver Carr, III, Carr Properties’ CEO, said in a statement announcing the acquisition.

This now-former bank building figures prominently in that plan. It must move in order to provide the footprint to allow for a replacement cineplex for the Regal Cinemas Bethesda 10. The Regal is the only cineplex in downtown Bethesda that shows mainstream blockbuster movies.

One study has shown that a multi-screen cineplex like Regal draws an additional 20,000 people into a downtown area every weekend. As you can imagine, permanent loss of this economic engine would be a complete disaster for the downtown Bethesda economy. The "dinner and movie" business is huge, as any restaurateur within walking distance of Regal can tell you.

I thought every member of the Montgomery County Council and Planning Board revealed themselves to a person as unfit for office a few years ago, when not a single one of them spoke up to preserve a cineplex when a different Apex Building deal was under discussion. To have that poor of a knowledge of basic economics of cities, and hold office in arguably the most-educated jurisdiction in America, is simply astonishing.

No one is more concerned about historic preservation than I am. And I think we need to do everything we can to ensure that this historic building moves somewhere in downtown Bethesda (the building was already moved once to make way for the Apex Building in the late 1980s). It dates back to the 1890s, when it was a general store and post office. Historians believe it was the only retail store in Bethesda at the turn of the century in 1900.

But if you tell me the choice is losing the building versus destroying the economy of downtown Bethesda, I will have to pick the cineplex over the historic building. I sure don't like the idea. But we don't have much choice. The stakes are too high.

I commend Carr for proposing to include space for a cineplex in the new project. Now our incompetent "leaders" have to make sure it ends up happening. Let's hope the Council does a better job finding a place for this historic building than they've done finding a new school bus depot.









Wednesday, June 01, 2016

Bethesda construction update: Saah Building facade renovation (Photos)

Work continues on the upgrade of the facade at the Saah Building at 7813-7817 Old Georgetown Road in Bethesda. The design by local architecture firm Steven J. Karr, AIA, Inc. will increase the amount of glass and natural light on the second floor, and add a mural to the north wall of the building.

All current tenants of the building remain open for business throughout the renovation.

Developer seeks yet another delay on Washington Episcopal School high-rise in Bethesda

A developer whose high-rise building project at the Washington Episcopal School in Bethesda has already been delayed multiple times is seeking yet another extension. The excuse? The same as was given almost a year ago: a traffic signal warrant analysis for the intersection of Landy Lane and River Road.

Unbelievably, planning staff are recommending the Montgomery County Planning Board grant the extension at its meeting tomorrow. You've got to be kidding me - you had a year to complete a traffic signal study, and you couldn't do it?

In theory, developers have to move forward with a project with some reasonable wiggle room for extensions because, eventually, the conditions under which it was approved may no longer exist. The real reason for the multiple delays of this now-100' tall tower appears to be that the developer wants to convert this senior housing project to non-age-restricted housing. Why else would they claim they cannot complete a basic traffic study, and repeatedly stall until the Westbard sector plan changed?

Switching from senior to all-ages by itself totally blows aside all of the calculations made at the time of approval on the impact of this project on roads and schools.

The Citizens Coordinating Committee on Friendship Heights opposed the extension in a letter to planners, noting that the project has now been pending for eight years. They also recalled the Planning Board stating that the last extension would be the last such delay granted.

Finally, the CCCFH is urging the developer and planners to ensure that a site plan is submitted for the project, as required by law, saying that the extension should provide them ample time to get it done.

After approving historic tax hike, County Council now wants new Metro tax

"It's not just, 'no,'
it's 'hell no.'"

Will the massively-inconvenient Metro "safety project" scheduled to begin this weekend actually produce results? That is hardly clear. What is clear, is that the inconvenience is in part designed for a goal beyond safety - softening up you, the taxpayer, for a major tax increase.

We've already dealt with one "urgent" Metro crusade to fix long-delayed mechanical and safety issues throughout the system, leaving many weekend riders standing for hours in stations or taking shuttle buses instead. The results of that were zero, squat, zilch, as the current safety crisis proves.

But the big talk we've been hearing about the need for extreme measures like shutting down whole lines for months just happens to be coming from some of the biggest proponents of new taxes to fund Metro, including D.C. Councilman Jack Evans and Montgomery County Councilmember Roger Berliner.

Funding increased Metro capacity - expanding to 8-car trains, in particular, and increasing capacity on the Red Line north of Grosvenor - was something many transportation advocates have supported. The idea of simply pouring a whole lot of additional money into the bastion of incompetency known as WMATA, however, is a completely different prospect. It is very similar, coincidentally, to the Montgomery County Council's irresponsible decision to massively raise taxes on residents, and bust the bank by going $90 million over the required funding level for Montgomery County Public Schools - without a dramatically-different strategy to tackle the achievement gap than the failed one being utilized now by MCPS. Money down a toilet, in other words.

It's no surprise, then, that some of the loudest voices calling for a massive new tax for Metro are on the Council.

“We hope to have a plan ready to present by the end of September,” Councilmember Roger Berliner told The Washington Post. “Between now and then, we’re going to work with our jurisdictions to see if we can come up with unanimity with respect to a mechanism — a sales tax, a gas tax." 

Are you kidding me?

WMATA has shown zero results, and zero evidence to prove it is changing its ways. The agency is probably in need of a federal takeover, but even the feds don't want to touch this mess.

You'll also note that, once again, no proposal under consideration involves taxing developers, just the residents.

While many local leaders and media types are almost giddy about the pain you are going to feel using public transit starting this weekend, I have a more sobering prediction.

This really, really bad PR campaign designed to make you believe we really need to pour more money into the coffers of an entity ranking somewhere between Barwood Cab and the County liquor monopoly in terms of public popularity, is actually going to deal already-declining Metro a mortal blow. A grand strategy to get more cash is actually going to end up costing WMATA cash.

Because, starting this weekend, folks are going to be getting into their cars, not out of them. They're going to be buying cheap used cars. To a lesser extent, they're going to be biking or using Zipcar or Uber (don't tell the County Council). 

And many, many months from now, they're going to consider the calls for new taxes for a Metro slush fund. And they're going to consider the latest fare increases being proposed for the same service that ain't worth it at half the price.

And you know what they're going to say?

Their reaction will be exactly what Del. David Albo of Fairfax County's was: 

“It’s not just no, it’s ‘hell no,’ ” 

Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Bethesda pays tribute to its fallen on Memorial Day (Photos)

Citizens and community organizations paid tribute to Bethesda and Chevy Chase residents who lost their lives in conflicts since World War I yesterday at Veterans Park. Among those who placed wreaths at the Veterans Park memorial Monday were the Rotary Club of Bethesda-Chevy Chase, Montgomery County Government, Bethesda Urban Partnership, and the Bethesda-Chevy Chase Chamber of Commerce (now known as the Greater Bethesda Chamber of Commerce).

The memorial in Veterans Park is specific to local residents who were killed in combat.



Betrayed by County Council on taxes, constituents speak out

The Montgomery County Council is hearing from constituents after voting unanimously to raise the overall tax burden to the highest level in County history last week. Many have taken to Facebook to vent on the councilmembers' pages:


Mark Bickel reminded Councilmember Hans Riemer that Riemer and his Council colleagues will all still receive a "MASSIVE salary increase" of 28% to $136,258 a year, even as they raised taxes and slashed the salary increases of County employees. The latter move led one County union official to call the nine councilmembers "clowns."

Many of those complaining are Democrats, and are warming to Robin Ficker's proposed ballot question on term limits for the Council. "Hans...dude...a 9% increase in property taxes?" wrote Richard Garifo. "Really? I'm blue to the bone but I have GOT to question how this money is being spent. This term-limit thing is looking pretty good right now."

"An 8.7% tax increase is nothing to be proud of. You should be embarrassed," wrote Ed Rothenberg.

Several citizens have asked to see any document that actually formalizes the agreement that the Council and their Board of Education colleagues have boasted they reached with this budget. The drama quickly ended, however, when a Council staff member acknowledged to Louis Wilen that there is no such document that requires Montgomery County Public Schools to reduce class sizes. Whoops! Not surprising, as the Council has no authority to enforce any such actions by MCPS or the BOE.

Streetsense signs go up at closed Bethesda Community Store property (Photos)

Streetsense, the Bethesda real estate firm marketing the vacant Bethesda Community Store property to potential tenants, has erected signage at the site. The property, at 8804 Old Georgetown Road, is in the process of being cleared since the recent closure of the store.

As a historic site, it cannot be demolished and replaced. But under certain guidelines, the existing store building could be expanded, as was recently shown with the former Bethesda U.S. Post Office by the Hyatt hotel.
Former site of the outdoor BBQ
stand, which has been removed


92-year-old store building 


Monday, May 30, 2016

Vehicle burglary at Shops at Sumner Place, theft at BCC HS + more - Bethesda crime update

Here's a roundup of crimes reported across Bethesda on May 27, according to crime data:

Theft. 7700 block Woodmont Avenue.

Liquor arrest. Woodmont Avenue at Old Georgetown Road.

Theft. 7600 block Old Georgetown Road.

Theft. Bethesda-Chevy Chase High School.

Theft. Bloomingdale's.

Vehicle burglary. 10600 block Weymouth Street.

Vehicle burglary. Shops at Sumner Place.

Theft. Westfield Montgomery Mall.

Bethesda construction update: Former BlackFinn building (Photos)

The former BlackFinn nightclub building at 4901 Fairmont Avenue has been gutted and reconfigured into smaller retail spaces. One will be home to De Tapas, a new small plates restaurant concept from the owners of Bold Bite around the corner. Another has been leased to European Wax Center, a waxing salon chain.

Work has come along substantially since my last update. You can see that the new facade design contains much more glass than the original.

Design for the new retail center was done by the local architecture firm of Steven J. Karr, AIA, Inc. Sigal Construction is the contractor.