The new Stonehall Bethesda ultra-luxury condominium building at 8302 Woodmont Avenue will welcome its first residents in July. Developed by Duball, LLC, the building's 46 units will range from the $600,000s to penthouses that start at $2.3 million. If you've been following my updates, you'll note that the original starting price was $800,000 for 2-bedrooms. Stonehall's 3-bedroom units ($1.7 million) and penthouses retain their original prices.
Currently, the interiors of units on the first floor are being built-out, with cabinets going in this week. By early July, the building's lobby and common areas are expected to be completed. The facade will follow in mid-July. Residents who have purchased units on the first floor will move in by late July. The remaining units will be completed by the end of August. Stonehall is directly across the street from a 24-hour Harris Teeter grocery store, with a pharmacy and Starbucks.
A first floor retail tenant - currently rumored to be either a bank or a restaurant - will follow, as well. The building's sales office is located at 7706 Woodmont Avenue. Stonehall has a rare pull-off driveway for residents and deliveries, and that circular driveway porte-cochère is one of several architectural features that really set this building apart from its competitors.
13 comments:
Finally a post from Dyer that is similar to why I started reading. Stay out of politics. Thank you.
Yeah this is the good stuff from Dyer.
5:18: I've covered many non-political topics this week alone - pet resort, utility work, movies, LoveSac, crime, Kenwood fireworks, and in a few moments, I will have some restaurant opening news.
Yet it's critical that we have at least one independent media outlet holding Montgomery County's elected officials accountable. I am filling that role, and that's a major reason many are turning to this site, in addition to the real estate, retail, crime and restaurant news.
How many are "turning to your site"?
I love the local news stuff too. The political opinions I just chalk up to Dyer campaigning for office. He certainly does hold "accountable" a lot of crap that gets pulled, but it would be nice to see some more details, data, and sources on his own ideas. That would be really helpful.
"Yet it's critical that we have at least one independent media outlet holding Montgomery County's elected officials accountable"
You don't "hold them accountable" you hurl ridiculous insults and postulate absurd conspiracy theories. It IS critical that we hold them accountable and I would certainly be open to reading valid criticism, but I shouldn't have to sift through the 90% of ad hominem attacks and stemming from whatever personal gripes you have with Hans Riemer.
The county council is inept in many ways, but your "holding them accountable"amounts to: "The MoCo political cartel should be thrown in jail for allowing today's thunderstorm."
"I am filling that role, and that's a major reason many are turning to this site, in addition to the real estate, retail, crime and restaurant news."
I promise you 99.9% of your readers would stop visiting this site if you stopped reporting on real estate etc. and turned into a full-fledged mudslinging/fake news blog (ie. a local Breitbart).
Why no mention of the Henri at Pike and Rose!??!?!?!?!?!?
That is neither a "circular driveway" nor a ""porte-cochère".
Anonymous @ 12:15PM
I'm liking this "telling-it-like-it-really-is" side of you.
We need more of it in today's world.
12:15: No, you're all wrong. They should be locked up for their specific criminal activity, not "today's thunderstorm." Every article on the Council is entirely fact-based, not "theories." People read my site for various reasons, including that they can trust they are getting the "rest of the story" on what's going on with our corrupt elected officials (unlike readers of the small and slightly-failing magazine).
1:22: Don't apply for an architecture job - it is absolutely both of those things.
1:41: He's off his meds, but I just told him "like it really is," so you should enjoy that.
There is no criminal activity. The article may be fact-based, but then the opining begins and turns it into a blather of unwarranted speculation.
6:21: Wrong again. Illegal use of funds confirmed by a County department, for example, isn't "unwarranted speculation."
Yeah, you keep peddling that crap.
You're wrong and can't admit it.
If there was anything to it, you'd be a national name in investigative journalism and the "criminals" would be tried, convicted and jailed.
Post a Comment