Who needs to sign up right away? Nearby residents and small business owners.
Issues in the plan that really need to be addressed by the Planning Board include the out-of-character urban heights, massing and density recommended and illustrated in the plan. The image shown prominently on the upper right of the draft plan's cover is a great example of a purely urban character being shown for a purely suburban residential area nowhere near a Metro station.
Other flaws include the severe lack of public amenities and facilities in the plan, an equally severe lack of proposals (actually, no proposals at all) to address the addition of 4087 cars onto an already congested commuter route (River Road), school overcrowding, and the absence of office space in the plan.
Here's an in-depth analysis of the plan, and aspects of it that have been kept quiet so far by the County and the media - such as the fact that building heights will be even taller than those cited in the plan. Shh...
28 comments:
If more offices are built in Westbard, will Dyer get a job in one of them?
I wish the Dyer troll would go away and stay away.
That being said, is there any hope of effecting any change at all with the planning board? Have they ever changed a plan due to public outcry? Thanks for any insight.
Robert you should be flattered - the Troll seems to spend more time on your site than you!
How come Dyer hasn't reported on Lord & Taylor's being awarded damages for breach of contract from the Lerners? You'd figure he'd be interested in that story. I guess not.
5:28: With the Chevy Chase Lake plan, the Board actually took the opposite approach, playing Bad Cop to the Planning Staff's Good Cop. They put more height and density into that plan, and then the County Council played Good Cop by slightly reducing height and density.
In the end, though, the developers got the height and density they wanted - the Good Cop/Bad Cop is Kabuki theater to allow the Council to say they reduced the scale in a wise and judicious compromise, while delivering the goods in return for the big checks they got from the developers.
You think that was an intentional coordinated effort?
I am totally against unlimited speakers. All speakers should be required to coordinate topics and speaking points and provide a representative who cohesively provides a combined statement. Such a waste of time to hear individuals with the same speaking points and no organized response.
So glad they got the density. Put the land to good use so close in to DC, freshen up the dilapidated area, provide more housing and services. Less density would have driven up the costs per unit and passed on the costs to the consumer too.
3:44: North Korea, Cuba and China agree with you.
3:43: Absolutely.
4:02: I'm sure the rich, white people who move in will greatly appreciate the "discount" prices in "dilapidated" Chevy Chase, MD.
Is there hard evidence to support the theory?
"Good Cop/Bad Cop is Kabuki theater"
Mixed Metaphors Alert!
The developers, and their lawyers, certainly expect returns on their $ contributions to the Council. And they will get it...doesn't matter what the community wants.
The troll is the same guy. He lurks on Dyer's site most of the day looking for attention.
7:07: You do realize your position - that citizens should be denied their right to speak - is extreme and standard policy in the countries I mentioned?
I don't think anyone with common sense would take such a radical position "seriously" in the USA.
@ 7:09 PM
More idiotic hyperbole.
7:08: Yes, the public actions of each of those involved. The councilmembers then made the spurious claim that they had "right-sized" Chevy Chase Lake in defiance of the evil Planning Board during the 2014 election - despite the developers strategically ending up with exactly the height and density they had wanted all along.
You need to read "Power: A Radical View" to understand the tactics the MoCo political cartel uses.
Rule #1 from the book on planning options - every option on the table is acceptable to the developers. Options that are unacceptable - such as 45' heights at "Westbard" - are never even an option on the table to begin with.
7:15: It's exactly what the commenter suggested - meaning that, by your definition, the troll comment is also "idiotic hyperbole". Considering you probably posted both comments, reach your own conclusion.
Well this is a first. Someone who said something negative and positive is the same person.
If it's negative it's also the same person.
If it's positive it's multiple people supporting Dyer.
How did "organized and cohesive combined response" turn into denied right to speak?
5:42: Everyone except for the person delivering the "organized and cohesive combined response" (this sounds like Soviet speak) isn't being allowed to speak under your bizarre scenario. You apparently find the Norman Rockwell painting of the working man rising to speak at a public meeting a horrifying threat. Too bad. Welcome to America.
5:41: Both comments were negative. Both were clearly posted by the same troll.
It's the same guy posting the nasty stuff. He'll go quiet if working on something (which isn't too often).
1)Re: coordinated response: That *might* make sense if Montgomery County Planning had polled residents to get an accurate sense of citizens' views, or otherwise developed a plan which recognized residents' sensibilities. As that has not happened, I urge residents and small businesses in Westbard to sign up to testify and make their views known.
2)I found it easy to sign up to testify and I urge others to do so.
3)I agree that the MoCo Planning Department process has been "gamed" to emphasize high density. A plan utilizing existing heights of 45' was never seriously considered, despite (insofar as can be gleaned from public meetings) overwhelming public support. Watching this process has, I am sorry to say, made me more cynical about the Montgomery County Planning Department and Montgomery County government generally.
Contd: I note, however, that the MoCo public testimony sign-up process was easy-- strike 1 blow for democracy.
Post a Comment